№12|2019

WASTEWATER TREATMENT

DOI 10.35776/MNP.2019.12.02
UDC 504.533:628.35.504.4.062.2

Safonov Aleksei, Andriushchenko N., Popova N., Boldyrev Kirill

Natural materials for sorption purification of chrome
and cadmium-containing leachates of solid waste landfills

Summary

The analysis of the sorption characteristics of natural materials (vermiculite, expanded clay, perlite, «Trade» zeolite) during the purification of cadmium and chromium-containing leachate with a high COD load was carried out. It was determined that zeolite had the maximum sorption capacity for Cd and Cr and the lowest biological fouling. When using vermiculite and expanded clay or mixtures on their basis, one can expect an increase in the sorption capacity for Cd and Cr during microbial fouling that inevitably occurs during contacting with water polluted with organic compounds and nutrients. In this case biofouling can increase the immobilization properties of materials for redox-dependent metals due to the enzymatic resources of bacterial cells that use them as electron acceptors. The effect of microbial fouling changed the parameters of materials in different directions: for Cr, in most cases, downward, and for Cd, significantly upward. Moreover, chromium biological recovery by biofilms is an additional effect of immobilization. Varying the composition of the sorption material provides for selecting mixtures that are optimally suitable for the purification of leachates from solid waste landfills with high COD and nutrients load, both when used in situ and in surface systems.

Key words

, , , , , , , , , ,

The further text is accessible on a paid subscription.
For authorisation enter the login/password.
Or subscribe

REFERENCES

  1. Sharova O. A. [The influence of the solid waste landfill on the state of groundwater (by the example of a solid waste landfill of Krasny Yar settlement, Astrakhan region)]. Vestnik TGU, 2014, no. 5, pp. 1741–1743. (In Russian).
  2. Mansouri B., Salehi J., Rezaei M. Leachate and pollution levels of heavy metals in the groundwater near municipal solid waste landfill site of Mashhad, Iran. Iranian Journal of Toxicology, 2014, no. 8, pp. 1068–1072.
  3. Saravanan R., Sundaram L. K., Gopalakrishnan A. N., Ravikumar G. Modeling of groundwater pollution due to solid waste dumping – a case study. International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering, 2010, no. 3 (2), pp. 176–187.
  4. Brozou E., Ioannou Z., Antoniadis V., Dimirkou A. Adsorbtion of hexavalent chromium from aqueus solutions onto modified zeolites: Proceedings of 13th International Conference of Environmental Science and Technology, Athens, Greece. 5–7 September 2013.
  5. Obiri-Nyarko F., Grajales-Mesa S. J., Malina G. An overview of permeable reactive barriers for in situ sustainable groundwater remediation. Chemosphere, 2014, no. 111, pp. 243–259.
  6. Ouki S. K., Cheesman C., Perry R. Effects of conditioning and treatment of chabazite and clinoptilolite prior to lead and cadmium removal. Environmental Science and Technology, 1993, no. 27:6, pp. 1108–1116.
  7. Peric J., Trgo M., Vukojevic Medvidovic N. Removal of zinc, copper and lead by natural zeolite – a comparison of adsorption isotherms. Water Resources, 2004, no. 4, pp. 1893–1899.
  8. Ghassabzadeh H., Mohadespour A., Torab-Mostaedi M., Zaheri P., Maragheh M. G., Taheri H. Adsorption of Ag, Cu and Hg from aqueous solutions using expanded perlite. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, no. 177, pp. 950–955.
  9. Pagnanelli F., Viggi C. C., Mainelli S., Toro L. Assessment of solid reactive mixtures for the development of biological permeable reactive barriers. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, no. 170 (2–3), pp. 998–1005.
  10. Silva B., Tuuguu E., Costa F., Rocha V., Lago A., Travares T. Permeable biosorbent barrier for wastewater remediation. Environmental Processes, 2017, v. 4, no. 1, pp. 195–206.
  11. Zhang X., Lv G., Liao L., He M., Li Z., Wang M. Removal of low concentrations of ammonium and humic acid from simulated groundwater by vermiculite/palygorskite mixture. Water Environment Research, 2012, no. 84 (8), pp. 682–688.
  12. Berridge M. V., Tan A. S. Characterization of the cellular reduction of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT): subcellular localization, substrate dependence, and involvement of mitochondrial electron transport in MTT reduction. Archives Biochemistry and Biophysics, 1993, v. 303, pp. 474–482.
  13. Plakunov V. K., Mart’yanov S. V., Teteneva N. A., Zhurina M. V. A universal method for quantitative characterization of growth and metabolic activity of microbial biofilms in static models. Microbiology, 2016, v. 85, no. 4, pp. 509–513.
  14. Simonova T. N., Dubrovin V. A., Denisov L. I. Extraction-photometric determination of chromium (VI) in water with diphenylcarbazide using two-phase aqueous systems. Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 2010, no. 53 (8), pp. 22–25.
  15. Kats E. M., Nikashina V. A., Bychkova Ia. V. [Sorption of heavy metals Ni, Cd, Cr, Zn, Cu from surface water on natural and modified clinoptilolites] Sorbtsionnye i Khromatograficheskie Protsessy, 2013, v. 13, issue 6, pp. 808–815. (In Russian).
  16. Garg S. K., Tripathi M., Srinath T. Strategies for chromium bioremediation of tannery effluent. Rev. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2012, no. 217, pp. 5–140.

Banner Oct 2024

myproject msk ru

Баннер конференции г. Пятигорск

мнтк баннер

souz ingenerov 02

Aquatherm 200x200 gif ru foreign