№12|2021

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

DOI 10.35776/VST.2021.12.02
UDC 628.52:537.523

Vasiliak L. M., Koudryavtsev N. N., SMIRNOV A. D.

Efficiency of gas discharge methods for odor control in municipal wastewater transportation and treatment systems

Summary

In the process of wastewater transportation and treatment malodorous substances are released into the air; among them hydrogen sulfide being one of the most difficult to remove. Various methods are used to remove malodorous substances from the air, including gas-discharge (plasma, ionization) methods that have proven remarkably effective in other industries. Vent emissions generated during wastewater treatment are specified by high humidity, high concentration of hydrogen sulfide, potential explosion hazard. These properties limit the possible use of gas discharge methods for the purification of this type of vent emissions. The specificity of applying gas discharge methods for air purification at the wastewater treatment facilities and wastewater pumping stations is described. The arising technical difficulties are presented.

Key words

, , , ,

The further text is accessible on a paid subscription.
For authorisation enter the login/password.
Or subscribe

REFERENCES

  1. Ochistka vybrosov vrednykh (zagriazniaiushchikh) veshchestv v atmosfernyi vozdukh pri proizvodstve produktsii (tovarov), a takzhe pri provedenii rabot i okazanii uslug na krupnykh predpriiatiiakh. Informatsionno-tekhnicheskii sprevochnik po nailuchshim dostupnym tekhnologiiam ITS 22-2016 [Removing emissions of harmful (polluting) substances released into the air during the manufacture of products (goods), as well as during work and provision of services at large enterprises. Information Technology Guide to Best Available Technologies ITS 22-2016. Moscow, Biuro NDT Publ., 2016].
  2. Bogomolov M. V., Karmazinov F. V., Kostiuchenko S. V. [Methods of odor control in in the systems of wastewater transportation and treatment]. Vodosnabzhenie i Sanitarnaia Tekhnika, 2016, no. 7, pp. 33–43. (In Russian).
  3. Kleinbeck S., et al. Odor thresholds and breathing changes of human volunteers as consequences of sulphur dioxide exposure considering individual factors. Safety and Health at Work, 2011, v. 2, no. 4, pp. 355–364. doi:10.5491/SHAW.2011.2.4.355.
  4. Strelkov A. K., Vasilyak L. M., Smirnov A. D. Udalenie zapakhov na predpriiatiiakh kommunal’nogo khziaistva: opyt razlichnykh stran [Removing odors in public utilities: experience from different countries]. Available at http://watermagazine.ru/nauchnye-stati2/novye-stati/24162-udalenie-zapakhov-na-predpriyatiyakh-kommunal-nogo-khozyajstva-opyt-razlichnykh-stran.html (accessed 1.10.2021). (In Russian).
  5. Kozlov M. N., Gavrilin A. M., Kireev Iu. P., Dorofeev A. G. [Experience of Mosvodokanal JSC in using gas cleaning equipment at wastewater facilities]. Voda Magazine, 2017, no. 12 (124), pp. 44–46. (In Russian).
  6. Ponomarenko A. M., Vlasov D. Iu., Basov N. S., Novikov S. N., Kudriavtsev N. N., Kostiuchenko S. V. [On the choice of methods for removing malodorous substances from vent emissions of the transportation and wastewater treatment system]. Vodosnabzhenie i Sanitarnaia Tekhnika, 2021, no. 1, pp. 21–28. (In Russian).

Журнал ВСТ включен в новый перечень ВАК

Шлафман В. В. Проектирование под заданную ценность, или достижимая эффективность технических решений – что это?

Banner Kofman 1